After what a woman is wearing, her Eureka idea is how a woman is moving, because, girls, your 'body language' apparently screams "I'm asking for it". Some women who understand what 'body language' is, try to define if you can rape-proof the coordination between your brain and your limbs:
Rape-proof body language is crossed legs, crossed arms, and crossed fingers
Well, I think she needs to answer that question (about what is rape-proof body language), not me, but I can hazard a guess - crossed legs, crossed arms, and crossed fingers that the boy in front of you is not her son, because if that's what mothers are teaching their sons, then god help us! Nirbhaya wasn't even at a late show, like this woman said. I've said it before, but the only rape-proof clothing is the kind that has no human in it! Women are sometimes women's own worst enemies because mothers like this are the root cause of their sons behaving like they do.
- Neeti Palta, stand-up comedian
A prostitute and her body language can be very similar to mine
In theatre, you have to sometimes perpetuate a stereotype just so the character translates to the audience. So, if I'm playing a prostitute or a seductress, I might do something like what a Kareena Kapoor does in Chameli, for the audience to understand. But that doesn't mean it's the truth. A prostitute and her body language can be very similar to mine. In my last project, the director told me, "ladki ki tarah baitho". I asked him what he meant, and he said, "arrey, legs cross karke baitho". So that is their perception of what a girl should be like. Again, a prostitute's supposed body language is the society's construction of how she should behave. There is not some defined body-language that a woman is born with.
- Geetika Sinha, DU-based actor
What about the body language of a potential rapist?
This idea is ridiculous and irresponsible. It again places the onus of women's safety on women. It also makes all men seem incapable of being in control of themselves and respecting boundaries. Patriarchy and violence against women is a far more deep-rooted problem than the clothes we wear and our body language. So, when a woman dressed 'properly' and with 'appropriate' body language gets raped, what will they blame next? There are enough examples daily - girls getting raped by their fathers and brothers - what sort of body language would they have adopted to invite it? What about the body language of a potential rapist? Why don't we ever talk about them? Isn't it obvious by now that no matter what women wear, what time they are out, who they go with, they do get raped? What is this body language, and who decides when things stop being appropriate?
- Mallika Taneja, stage actress, has done satirical skits on attitudes towards rape
What's next? Her 'aura' asked for it?
Isn't it bad enough that we have men, in leadership positions, saying such bulls**t? Now, it's a woman. We've heard the timing and clothing points before, but this body language is something new. Next thing you know, someone will say, 'oh, her aura was not right and was inviting rape' or 'she was blinking her eyes too much'. No one invites rape, ever. Even if the female is naked, even then she can't be termed as inviting it. There can be no right or wrong body language for it.
- VJ Juhi Pande, who acted in the 'It's your fault' rape satire video
Now, the problem is that women have responsive, functional bodies!
What is this Khap-like woman-hater-rape-justifier doing on a women's commission? It just shows what a farce our society is. Such comments are reflective of a deeply misogynistic attitude that lays the onus of the crime on the victim, thus justifying rape. First, people had a problem with the kind of clothes girls wore, the time of day they were out; now, the problem has become the fact that they have responsive, functional bodies! Why not lobotomise women altogether, Dr Mirge? This comment also proves how women themselves become pillars of patriarchy, and are often the staunchest propagators of patriarchal and misogynistic attitudes.
- Swara Bhaskar, actress and anti-rape campaigner
Whose side are these panels on?
Going by the viewpoints routinely given by women officials from the various women's commissions across the country, including the National Commission for Women (NCW), you'd wonder how they're coming from a panel that works in women's interest, and not from a paan-spitting neta. Which women are they trying to represent? Try figuring out from the statements below:
2009: If the girls feel they were not doing anything wrong, why are they afraid to come forward and give a statement?
- NCW member Nirmala Venkatesh, after an attack by 40 Sri Ram Sena men on eight women in a Mangalore bar
2012: If a group of boys eve-teases you by calling you sexy, you should not get provoked, and instead, take it positively
- Mamta Sharma, then NCW chairperson
2012: Be comfortable, but be careful about how you dress. Aping the west blindly is eroding our culture and causing such crimes to happen
- Mamta Sharma, then NCW chairperson
2012: After a 17-year-old girl was molested by a gang outside a Guwahati pub, NCW member Alka Lamba had revealed her name to the media
(Inputs from Bohni Bandyopadhyay, Chandna Arora, Aanchal Tuli and Umang Aggarwal)